Deputy Chief Cabinet Secretary Hakubun Shimomura on Sunday denied that the Japanese military directly recruited women to work in brothels providing sex for Japanese soldiers before and during World War II.
"There were military nurses and embedded journalists but no 'embedded comfort women.' It is true that there were 'comfort women.' I believe some parents may have sold their daughters. But it does not mean the Japanese army was involved," Shimomura said in a program on Radio Nippon. Shimomura was referring to the controversial issue of whether the Japanese military was directly involved in forcing women, especially those from other Asian countries, into sexual servitude. Such women are euphemistically called "comfort women" in Japan.
Giappone, 2 esecuzioni il Venerdì Santo
-
Il governo giapponese ha confermato questa mattina l’esecuzione di due
condannati a morte da tempo nelle carceri nazionali. Lo rende noto
AsiaNews. L’ennes...
8 years ago
Posts
3 comments:
"Comfort women's true character which I looked at." by Mr. Hiro Onoda. from "The Seiron 2006.1"
http://ime.nu/www4.airnet.ne.jp/kawamura/enigma/2005/2005-01-16-onoda_ianhunoshoutai.html
60 years after World War II pass, and the survivors of Japanese Imperial Army soldiers of those days are a few.
I testify for comfort women's work having been completely business.
There was no proof that forcible taking of the comfort women was carried out. Japanese government.
http://ime.nu/www.sankei.co.jp/seiji/seisaku/070316/ssk070316003.htm
The intention of the Communist Party of China is strongly shown in the contribution to the Honda U.S. Representative.
http://ime.nu/www.sankei.co.jp/kokusai/china/070315/chn070315001.htm
The Honda U.S. Representative is pursuing the comfort-women problem.
The contribution of the Chinese to him is a large sum unnaturally.
http://ime.nu/www.sankei.co.jp/kokusai/usa/070315/usa070315001.htm
Basic knowledge about a comfort-women problem.
1.Work in a service club was business.
2."Military Comfort women" are fabrication although "comfort women" existed. This difference is important.
Since there was no compulsion, this was not war crime.
Comfort station originated in govt-regulated 'civilian prostitution'
To discuss the comfort women issue, it is indispensable to understand the social background of the time
when prostitution was authorized and regulated by the government in Japan.
Prostitution was tacitly permitted in limited areas up until 1957, when the law to prevent prostitution was enforced.
Comfort women received remuneration in return for sexual services at so-called comfort stations for military officers and soldiers.
According to an investigation report publicized by the government on Aug. 4, 1993,
on the issue of comfort women recruited into sexual service for the Japanese military,
there is a record mentioning the establishment of such a brothel in Shanghai around 1932,
and additional similar facilities were established in other parts of China occupied by the Imperial Japanese Army.
Some of them were under the direct supervision of the military authorities,
but many of the brothels catering to soldiers were privately operated.
Modern historian Ikuhiko Hata, a former professor at Nihon University, says
the comfort women system should be defined as the "battleground version of civilian prostitution."
Comfort women were not treated as "paramilitary personnel," unlike military nurses and military correspondents.
During the war, comfort women were not called "prostitutes for troops."
Use of such generic terminology spread after the war.
The latter description is said to have been used by writer Kako Senda (1924-2000) in his book titled
"Prostitutes for troops" published in 1973. Thereafter, the usage of prostitutes for troops prevailed.
In addition to Japanese women, women from the Korean Peninsula and Taiwan,
both then under Japanese colonial rule, and China, the Philippines, Indonesia
and other countries invaded by the Imperial Japanese Army were recruited as comfort women.
Hata estimates that 40 percent of the wartime comfort women were Japanese,
30 percent Chinese and other nationalities and 20 percent Korean.
The total number of comfort women has yet to be determined exactly.
According to a report compiled by Radhika Coomaraswany of the U.N. Commission on Human Rights in 1996,
there were 200,000 comfort women from the Korean Peninsula alone.
The figure in the report was based on information Coomaraswany had obtained in North Korea.
But this report contained many factual errors, and its quoted sources lacked impartiality.
Japanese Foreign Minister Taro Aso rejected the figure of 200,000 as "lacking objective evidence."
The reasons cited for the need for comfort women and wartime brothels are as follows:
-- To prevent military officers and soldiers from raping women and committing other sex crimes in occupied areas.
-- To prevent venereal disease from spreading through troops who would otherwise contact local prostitutes who did not receive periodic medical checks.
-- To prevent military secrets from being leaked by limiting the women who provided sexual services to officers and soldiers to recruited comfort women.
Such a system and the use of wartime brothels generally are not limited only to the Imperial Japanese military.
The U.S. troops that occupied Japan after the war used brothels provided by the Japanese side.
There was a case in which U.S. military officials asked the Japanese authorities to provide women for sexual services.
During the Vietnam War, brothels similar to those established for the former Japanese military
were available to U.S. troops, a U.S. woman journalist has pointed out.
Hata said: "There were wartime brothels also for the German troops during World War II.Some women were forced into sexual slavery.
South Korean troops had brothels during the Korean War, according to a finding by a South Korean researcher."
No hard evidence of coercion in recruitment of comfort women
The U.S. House of Representatives has been deliberating a draft resolution calling for the Japanese government
to apologize over the matter by spurning the practice as slavery and human trafficking.
Why has such a biased view of the issue prevailed?
The issue of the so-called comfort women has been brought up repeatedly
because misunderstandings that the Japanese government and the Imperial Japanese Army forced women into sexual servitude have not been completely dispelled.
The government has admitted the Imperial Japanese Army's involvement in brothels, saying that
"Japanese military was, directly or indirectly, involved in the establishment and management of the comfort stations and the transfer of comfort women."
The "involvement" refers to giving the green light to opening a brothel, building facilities, setting regulations regarding brothels,
such as fees and opening hours, and conducting inspections by army doctors.
However, the government has denied that the Japanese military forcibly recruited women.
On March 18, 1997, a Cabinet Secretariat official said in the Diet,
"There is no evidence in public documents that clearly shows there were any forcible actions [in recruiting comfort women]."
No further evidence that could disprove this statement has been found.
The belief that comfort women were forcibly recruited started to spread
when Seiji Yoshida, who claimed to be a former head of the mobilization department of the Shimonoseki branch of an organization in charge of recruiting laborers,
published a book titled "My War Crime" in 1983.
Yoshida said in the book that he had been involved in looking for suitable women to force them into sexual slavery in Jeju,South Korea.
"We surrounded wailing women, took them by the arms and dragged them out into the street one by one," he said in the book.
But researchers concluded in the mid-1990s that the stories in the book are not authentic.
On March 5 this year, Prime Minister Shinzo Abe said at the House of Councillors Budget Committee that Yoshida's story does not prove
that women were forcibly recruited. He said: "I think it was The Asahi Newspaper [that reported the story]
that a man named Seiji Yoshida testified about his having searched for comfort women.
But later [Yoshida's testimony] was found to have been made up."
As the comfort women issue started to take on political and diplomatic dimensions,
some people in South Korea and also in Japan confused comfort women with female volunteer corps,
strengthening the misbelief that there was coercion.
Female volunteer corps were, according to a historian Ikuhiko Hata's book "Comfort Women and Sex in the Battlefield",
single women aged between 12 and 40 who were mobilized to work in factories, starting in August 1944, primarily to secure necessary labor.
There were cases in which malicious brokers sweet-talked women with promises of easy money or intentionally
concealed from them what life was going to be like in brothels.
The War Ministry wrote a letter, dated March 4, 1938, to the troops dispatched to China.
The letter, titled "Regarding the recruiting of women at the army's comfort stations," said
there were malicious brokers who were recruiting women in a way "similar to kidnapping."
It said, "Nothing should be overlooked so that the military's prestige and social orders are maintained.
" The letter indicates how the Imperial Japanese Army tried to make sure that women were not forcibly recruited.
However, in the confusion of war, elite Imperial Japanese Army soldiers who were on the fast track for officer status sent detained Dutch women to a brothel in Indonesia.
The incident came to be known as the Semarang incident.
The Imperial Japanese Army Headquarters closed down the brothel immediately after learning of the incident,
and soldiers involved received severe punishment
--some were sentenced to death--at a war crimes court convened by the Dutch Army after the war.
Post a Comment